I will also be (hopefully!) launching a second new interview series, sometime soon, entitled "Mentors and Giants of Canadian Political Science.".
The initial series of posts will be a couple of interviews I recently did with several senior political scientists who have had a substantial impact on my work or career.
Canada-First Nations relationships are obviously the topic of the day. Besides the very serious substantive issues that are under discussion, I noticed one interesting trend in the public debate, that is, the struggle over whether Chief Spence's diet constituted a genuine "hunger strike" or something else. In a lot of media coverage, journalists have been characterizing her protest as a "liquid only diet" or "liquid diet" or "forgoing solid foods", rather than a hunger strike.
Last week, Nobel Prize Winner and Public Choice economist James Buchanen, died.
You can read his NY Times obituary here.
Buchanan's work, and public choice in general, hasn't received a lot of attention in Canada (at least among Canadian political scientists, I think), as far as I can tell, yet the work is extremely important and relevant to understanding Canadian politics.